<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenCL on the CPU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sjbrown.co.uk/2009/01/16/opencl-on-the-cpu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sjbrown.co.uk/2009/01/16/opencl-on-the-cpu/</link>
	<description>Work log for ideas and hobby projects.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:25:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimiter "malkia" Stanev</title>
		<link>http://www.sjbrown.co.uk/2009/01/16/opencl-on-the-cpu/comment-page-1/#comment-2344</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimiter "malkia" Stanev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sjbrown.co.uk/?p=258#comment-2344</guid>
		<description>I think that OpenCL on the CPU must be always present

Reasons: Servers withoug GFX card, Remote Desktop, and as Simon said debugging. Also bit old benchmarking games for fun (&amp; profit).

Concerns: There should not be differences in calculations, given the same floating point rules (Obviously there is no 80bit floating point in most GPU&#039;s, so the CPU version should be probably SSE2 or something in the like).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that OpenCL on the CPU must be always present</p>
<p>Reasons: Servers withoug GFX card, Remote Desktop, and as Simon said debugging. Also bit old benchmarking games for fun (&amp; profit).</p>
<p>Concerns: There should not be differences in calculations, given the same floating point rules (Obviously there is no 80bit floating point in most GPU&#8217;s, so the CPU version should be probably SSE2 or something in the like).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aras Pranckevi?ius</title>
		<link>http://www.sjbrown.co.uk/2009/01/16/opencl-on-the-cpu/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Aras Pranckevi?ius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sjbrown.co.uk/?p=258#comment-551</guid>
		<description>I think Apple most likely will have a CPU implementation. All Macs sold nowadays are multicore, but some have crappy GPUs (Intel GMA 950 or X3100). The LLVM quote from wikipedia also probably refers to Apple (since, well, LLVM is mostly an Apple project, and they are already using it for OpenGL software fallbacks).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Apple most likely will have a CPU implementation. All Macs sold nowadays are multicore, but some have crappy GPUs (Intel GMA 950 or X3100). The LLVM quote from wikipedia also probably refers to Apple (since, well, LLVM is mostly an Apple project, and they are already using it for OpenGL software fallbacks).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.sjbrown.co.uk/2009/01/16/opencl-on-the-cpu/feed/ ) in 0.13946 seconds, on Feb 5th, 2012 at 9:06 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 5th, 2012 at 10:06 am UTC -->
